English

Bodies with power

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT)

Type
Government body
Place
China — People's Republic of China
Local name
中华人民共和国工业和信息化部
Last checked
2026-09-22
Next check due
2027-03-21

Ways to reach them

  • MIIT public comment section (意见征集) · Public consultation
    Works in: zh
    Unverified

    draft standards and guidelines

    PARTIALLY VERIFIED — individual comment notices under this path were confirmed via search (e.g. the 2026 humanoid-robotics standards-system draft at /gzcy/yjzj/art/2026/...), but the section index itself returned a redirect loop on fetch. Each notice carries its own feedback email and deadline inside the notice text.

  • MIIT AI Standardization Technical Committee · Regulatory docket
    Works in: zh
    Unverified

    AI standards

    UNVERIFIED (search result). Hosted by CAICT.

  • MIIT standards information service platform · Regulatory docket
    Works in: zh
    Unverified

    standards

    UNVERIFIED (search result).

  • Homepage · Homepage
    Unchecked

What it does

Industrial regulator for AI as a technology sector: compute infrastructure, telecoms, AI standardisation, humanoid robotics, and the 'AI+' industrial programmes. Issued the 'AI+ Information and Communications' Innovation Development Implementation Opinions (2026–2028) in 2026. Runs a standing public-comment section (公开征求意见) on draft standards and guidelines. Has licensing and administrative-penalty powers over telecoms and industrial operators.

Its powers

compel

Honest assessment

MIIT's comment windows are genuine and structurally open — the notices name a contact person and a feedback email. But they are Chinese-language, typically 30 days, aimed at domestic industry and research institutes, and use a downloadable Word feedback form (意见反馈表) with fields for work unit, name, and phone. A foreign individual can technically email a completed form; there is no acknowledgement mechanism and no evidence foreign submissions are considered.

Notes

MIIT's AI work is developmental/industrial rather than safety-focused. It is not a frontier-risk body.

Sources

Something wrong here?