English

Places to contact

AI Whistleblower Protection Act (S.1792) — federal, not law

Type
Public reporting channel
Place
United States — United States (proposed)
Last checked
2026-09-22
Next check due
2027-03-21
This record is preserved as reference material. It is not a current contact destination and is excluded from Places to contact and recommendations.

Ways to reach them

  • Submission page

    Whistleblower channel

    Information only · 2026-09-22
    Recipient
    AI Whistleblower Protection Act (S.1792) — federal, not law
    Who may use it
    Members of the public
    What it accepts
    Insider concerns; AI laws and policy; Systemic AI risks
    Information only. This link provides background or evidence; it is not a place to send a message.No contact action is available for this entry.
  • Homepage

    Homepage

    Information only
    Recipient
    AI Whistleblower Protection Act (S.1792) — federal, not law
    Who may use it
    Members of the public
    What it accepts
    Insider concerns; AI laws and policy; Systemic AI risks
    Information only. This link provides background or evidence; it is not a place to send a message.No contact action is available for this entry.

What it does

N/A — not enacted.

Honest assessment

Zero protection as of September 2026. Be precise about this in any playbook: a US AI worker has no AI-specific federal whistleblower statute. Their available routes are SB 53 (if California and catastrophic risk), SEC/Dodd-Frank (if securities fraud at a public company), state law, and contract/NDA analysis with counsel. The Right to Warn letter of June 2024 — signed by current and former OpenAI and Google DeepMind staff, asking for an anonymous process to raise risk concerns, an end to disparagement clauses and non-retaliation — produced voluntary company policy changes and Senate attention, but no enacted federal law.

How to file

N/A. Included because it is routinely and wrongly cited as existing protection. Introduced 15 May 2025; still in committee. It had sat in committee for roughly 495 days at the time of this research; of comparable Senate bills stuck in committee that long, about 1% ever advance.

Format

N/A

Timing

N/A

What happens after

N/A

What it accepts

N/A — not enacted.

What it does not accept

N/A

Operated by

US Senate; sponsored by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), with Sen. Chris Coons

Sources

Something wrong here?