Your Privacy
English

Places to contact

NAVER

Type
AI company
Place
South Korea
Last checked
2026-09-22
Next check due
2027-03-21
This record is preserved as reference material. It is not a current contact destination and is excluded from Places to contact and recommendations.

Ways to reach them

  • NAVER Cloud sales/support enquiry

    Web form

    Information only · 2026-09-22
    Recipient
    NAVER
    Who may use it
    People following the published contact instructions
    What it accepts
    Observed model behaviour; Systemic AI risks
    Information only. This link provides background or evidence; it is not a place to send a message.No contact action is available for this entry.

  • Homepage

    Homepage

    Information only
    Recipient
    NAVER
    Who may use it
    People following the published contact instructions
    What it accepts
    Observed model behaviour; Systemic AI risks
    Information only. This link provides background or evidence; it is not a place to send a message.No contact action is available for this entry.

  • NAVER AI Safety Framework (ASF), published 7 August 2024; ASF 2.0 reported in 2026 extending to user-facing services

    Published policy or framework

    Information only
    Recipient
    NAVER
    Who may use it
    People following the published contact instructions
    What it accepts
    Observed model behaviour; Systemic AI risks
    Information only. This link provides background or evidence; it is not a place to send a message.No contact action is available for this entry.

What it does

Future AI Center, supported by a risk management working group and a board-level risk management committee, operates the AI Safety Framework; frontier systems are reassessed every three months or when capability increases 6x.

Honest assessment

No public accounts found of anyone contacting NAVER about HyperCLOVA X safety. NAVER was among the earliest non-US companies to publish a frontier safety framework and extended it in 2026 to user-facing services, so the internal governance is real; but the framework document points an interested outsider at a cloud sales form, which is a telling gap between governance and accessibility.

Notes

Record as: framework published, no public safety channel. If you have a concern, the sales/support form is the only published door and you should expect it to be routed commercially.

Sources

Something wrong here?