English

Bodies with power

European Artificial Intelligence Board

Type
Government body
Place
European Union
Last checked
2026-09-22
Next check due
2027-03-21

Ways to reach them

  • Register of Commission Expert Groups — AI Board entry (agendas, participants, minutes) · Regulatory docket
    Verification expired · 2026-09-22

    This route is retained as reference only. Its verification is missing, more than 180 days old, or the contact window is not currently open; do not rely on it until it is re-checked.

    Public transparency record only. Agendas, membership and minutes are published here.

    VERIFIED — published on https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-board.

  • Direct public contact · Email address
    none published
    Verification expired · 2026-09-22

    This route is retained as reference only. Its verification is missing, more than 180 days old, or the contact window is not currently open; do not rely on it until it is re-checked.

    n/a

    VERIFIED ABSENCE — the Commission publishes no email or form for the AI Board; correspondence would go via the AI Office as secretariat (CNECT-AIOFFICE@ec.europa.eu).

  • Homepage · Homepage
    Unchecked

What it does

Advisory and co-ordination body created by the AI Act, operational since the Act took effect on 1 August 2024. Composed of one representative per Member State, chaired by a Member State, with the EDPS and EEA-EFTA states as observers; the AI Office is its secretariat. Ensures consistent application of the AI Act, co-ordinates national competent authorities, issues opinions and recommendations, and endorses key documents — it endorsed the adequacy assessments of the GPAI Code of Practice and of the Transparency of AI-Generated Content code, and guidance on harmonised standards for high-risk systems. It advises; it does not itself fine or investigate.

Its powers

advise

Honest assessment

NO PUBLIC INPUT ROUTE. The AI Board is a Member-State intergovernmental body; the public cannot address it. The only realistic influence is indirect — through your own national competent authority, which sits on the Board, or through the AI Office as secretariat. The expert-groups register is nonetheless valuable: minutes reveal what the Board is about to endorse, months before it appears as guidance, which is exactly when a national authority can still be lobbied.

Notes

Distinct from both the Scientific Panel (independent experts) and the Advisory Forum (stakeholders). All three are separate AI Act bodies.

Sources

Something wrong here?