Français

Organismes ayant un pouvoir

Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection

Type
Body with AI jurisdiction and named seats
Lieu
California, États-Unis — California
Dernière vérification
2026-09-22
Prochaine vérification
2026-12-21

Pas encore traduit — affiché en anglais.

Sièges nominatifs

  • Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — chair, D · Vérifié le 2026-09-22

Liste officielle et à jour des membres Vérifié

Comment les joindre

Ses responsabilités en matière d'IA

Primary Assembly committee of first referral for AI, algorithmic decision-making, chatbot, data-privacy and AI-transparency bills (e.g. SB 53, AB 1064, AB 1018, companion-chatbot bills). Also runs a joint hearing track with the Select Committee on Biotechnology and Medical Technology on AI in health.

Travaux en cours

SB 53 (Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, Wiener) — signed 25 Sep 2025. 2026 follow-ons signed: SB 813 (independent verification organizations, signed 9 Sep 2026), AB 1405 (AI auditor registry, signed 9 Sep 2026), SB 1119 + SB 867 (companion chatbots / AI toys, signed 10 Sep 2026), AB 1709, AB 1856, AB 2246 (minors/design code, signed 10 Sep 2026), SB 1050 (synthetic performer disclosure, signed 16 Sep 2026). Pending on Governor's desk as of 22 Sep 2026: SB 1000, AB 2713, AB 1609, SB 1111, SB 947, AB 1883.

Statut

VERIFIED — SB 53 in force; CA Dept. of Technology begins annual threshold reviews in 2027. EO N-9-26 (18 Sep 2026) accelerates SB 813/AB 1405 implementation and directs work toward a frontier-model 'kill switch'. 2026 session closed; ~two dozen AI bills signed 9–16 Sep 2026.

Voie d'accès publique

YES — strongest and most underused route in the country. Any individual may register once and file a formal position letter (Support / Oppose / Amend) on any bill through the Legislature's Advocates portal; the letter is entered into the committee's official bill file and summarized in the committee analysis. Deadline convention for this committee: 12:00 noon on the Tuesday one week before the Tuesday hearing. Written testimony submitted this way is public comment and may be read into the record. In-person testimony at the hearing is open (two primary witnesses per side plus an open 'me-too' line); telephonic testimony has been discontinued.

Voie administrative

CA Attorney General (oag.ca.gov — AI legal advisories, Jan 2025; exclusive SB 53 civil enforcement); California Privacy Protection Agency for automated decision-making technology under the CCPA ADMT regs (https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/ccpa_updates.html); California Civil Rights Department for FEHA automated-decision-system employment rules. Consumer complaints: https://oag.ca.gov/report

Note de recherche

The position-letter portal is open to 'individuals' as a registration category, not just lobbyists — confirmed on the portal itself. This is the single highest-leverage public-participation channel in US state AI policy and is dominated by trade associations.

Sources

Une erreur ?